Conservatives are Prudes

[Drake]

Who wouldn't hit Palin? Honestly.

[1bad65]

Hey BD, instead of launching yet another round of attacks on the Palin's daughter, could you please answer the pertinent, on topic questions asked of you?

[1bad65]

Unemployment should go up today. It appears Creigh Deeds will lose his job, and that John Corzine may be getting a pink slip as well. Hey, the good news for them is that Obama recently extended unemployment benefits!

[BoulderDawg]

I'm a liberal! I dodge questions I don't like! Didn't you know that?

I think concerns about that family are warrented. You can't preach family values for others. You gotta live them.

Buy hey, I'll party with the Palin girls! I'm sure they they have some interesting takes on "Family Values".

[Drake]

If you think a year is enough to fix the economy, you are wrong. Even Fmr Pres. Clinton rode on the coattails of Reagan's decisions.

[1bad65]

Originally Posted by BoulderDawg

I'm a liberal! I dodge questions I don't like! Didn't you know that?

At least you admit it.

And you know yyou are wrong, or you would address the questions. It's simple.

Originally Posted by BoulderDawg

I think concerns about that family are warrented. You can't preach family values for others. You gotta live them.

Explain that. You do realize that Sarah Palin doesn't even hold any elected office, right? So who gives a **** about her daughter's sex life?

[1bad65]

Originally Posted by Drake

If you think a year is enough to fix the economy, you are wrong.

Reagan had the Carter mess mostly turned around within a year.

Inflation and interest rates were well below what they were when he took office within a year.

And fyi, it's friggin WORSE than when Obama took office. He promised us that if he got his 'Stimulus' bill passed that unemployment would not break 8%. It's well over that now, and 10% is a distinct possibility.

[Drake]

Originally Posted by 1bad65

Reagan had the Carter mess mostly turned around within a year.

Economically, that's impossible.

[BoulderDawg]

Originally Posted by 1bad65

And you know yyou are wrong, or you would address the questions. It's simple.

Yeah Right! Like I'm suppose to answer to someone like you?

[Drake]

Originally Posted by BoulderDawg

Yeah Right! Like I'm suppose to answer to someone like you?

And you wonder why your credibility is shot to hell. Honestly, I'm even having trouble believing you understand even the basics of political discourse, and instead I believe you are playing along in order to get a "rise" out of people. In other words, I don't think you even know what being a liberal means, and instead choose to be so because it makes for a fun day of posting for you. Likely the same reason you decided to ally yourself with a racist and a liar. You didn't understand anything about the man, but because he was so despised, you wanted to be contrary and support him. Epic FAIL.

[1bad65]

Originally Posted by Drake

Economically, that's impossible.

Then Reagan must be The Miracle Worker.

Notice I said he had it "mostly" turned around. Many of the key economic indicators were alot better within a year of Reagan's leadership. This has not happened under Obama. It may (though I would bet against it), but it has not happened yet.

Keep in mind, it was so bad Carter himself had pretty much just given up. You have read/heard the 'Malaise Speech', right?

[1bad65]

Originally Posted by Drake

And you wonder why your credibility is shot to hell. Honestly, I'm even having trouble believing you understand even the basics of political discourse, and instead I believe you are playing along in order to get a "rise" out of people. In other words, I don't think you even know what being a liberal means, and instead choose to be so because it makes for a fun day of posting for you. Likely the same reason you decided to ally yourself with a racist and a liar. You didn't understand anything about the man, but because he was so despised, you wanted to be contrary and support him. Epic FAIL.

You may well have hit the nail on the head.

Look BD, at least two people asked you the same question. So using me as an excuse to duck it is not gonna fly. If you call someone a radical, and then you are asked why you consider him one, you have to answer IF you are truly interested in a debate. Now if you are trolling.....

[BoulderDawg]

Originally Posted by 1bad65

You may well have hit the nail on the head.

Look BD, at least two people asked you the same question. So using me as an excuse to duck it is not gonna fly. If you call someone a radical, and then you are asked why you consider him one, you have to answer IF you are truly interested in a debate. Now if you are trolling.....

Not going to fly? Why should I care what flies or doesn't fly with you or your brain washed buddy?

No one here name calls and shows as much disrespect as you two. Why should anyone answer your questions. Every single issue and almost every single post you two bring up is tied into Ward Churchill...all of them. Why should I show respect to anyone who disrespects a man I admire? Talk about trolling.

[1bad65]

You're back on ignore til you answer the simple question... Why do you consider Hoffman a radical?

Look, you were doing better. Then YOU went off on Palin's family AGAIN. Repeatedly. Then you called Hoffman a radical, and refuse to engage in debate as to why you consider him one. Look, I've called Obama a socialist. And when asked why, I answered. That's how debate works. It's not one guy calling names over and over. I could find a 2nd grader to discuss politics with if that's what I wanted. You are capable of rational debate, AT TIMES. But when you can't rationally defend your assertions or positions, it's always the same answer from you: 'Well the Palin family is a mess. They have a knocked up kid.'

As to us bringing up your lying buddy, I only do that when you start acting irrational. I know I use it as an example of you being irrational in the past to show others reading the debate your past history of being irrational when it comes to defending your ideals. Stop being irrational and I'll quit bringing it up.

[BoulderDawg]

Originally Posted by 1bad65

As to us bringing up your lying buddy, I only do that when you start acting irrational. I know I use it as an example of you being irrational in the past to show others reading the debate your past history of being irrational when it comes to defending your ideals. Stop being irrational and I'll quit bringing it up.

Think about what you just said. "If I post the way you want me to post then you will stop trolling"......

I invite you to keep on referencing Ward after every one of my post like you have been doing. That's fine with me. Even if he has nothing to do with most of the issues

Also, I haven't seen anything today about the misspelled word. That has nothing to do with any of these issues either although you've used in almost every post for the past week.

And you people say you're only interested in the issues.....