![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#31
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
anyhow, if i were yanlei being asked this kind of question, i would kindly ask you to mind your business. seriously, who asks another person about their sex life or lack thereof? especially since from your last post we can tell you knew warrior monks take only lay precepts, unless you are unfamiliar with what those are. Quote:
|
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
If Yan Lei doesn't need his records to advertise, why is he claiming to be a sanshou champion like his brother with his steel jacket? Why even mention it? He's using that claim to advertise. Don't even try to deny that.
Ask Yan Lei's master, Abbot Shi Yong Xin if anyone other than heshang or wuseng should be using the surname 'Shi'. On the record, he may be elusive because that's just the way he is. But off the record, especially within his close disciples, he'll be very clear on this point. |
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
i doubt that, but i've never met him. but i agree with you on this point. Quote:
but regardless, he has several other secular disciples that use the "shi" surname. and if that were a problem, then secular disciples also shouldnt have a generational dharma-name from the zibei used for monastics. they would have secular dharma-names with their own secular generation characters, just like many chinese families do for their children. other chinese buddhist schools do it like this as well. they have separate generational dharma-names for monastics and laymen. but... as i said before, shaolin tradition doesnt do it like that. and there are also many other unrelated buddhist monasteries in northern china that do the same "shi" + generation-name + given name for laity too! |
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
Abbot Shi Yong Xin's opinion doesn't matter in this?
|
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
seriously? how long have you been following shaolin? 2 years?
|
|
#36
|
||||
|
||||
|
NO.
Shaolin tradition matters in this, something Shi Yongxin Abbot has flipped on it's head a few times. Anyway, the guy is legit. I know plenty of fighters who train with him, a couple of my gongfu brothers are working with him while they are out there, and not only do I trust their word, just look at the freaking guy. Your 'argument' is basically saying a mack truck on the lot isn't a 'real' mack truck because it hasn't hauled a load off the yard yet. At the very best your argument only stands on ignorance- you don't know if his fight record is legit, nor do you know if he has a record which is not officially kept lol, which is actually the record which would interest me most if that was what I was interested in. And so who are you anyway? I mean, my friend, how do we know your claims aren't just made up hoopla and how do we any of us even know you would know a fighter if you saw one. Just saying mind the coin or the sword that cuts both ways. Have you produced a body of literature? A body of students and loyal disciples? Vouched for by a brotherhood of insane martial artists? What do you look like? |
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
|
In the present world of IMA/CMA and market segmentation, wearing the robe is akin to standing out and showing you have soemthing out of the ordinary!
On one hand we say the clothes does not make the man but in IMA/CMA, it is the clothes that makes the entrance, or a sheep in wolf's clothing or vice versa. Whether you judge a book by its cover or not is a personal decision but if you have 2 people, one wearing a monks robe and the other a suit and they both know Shaolin methods and training, it is the one with the monk's clothing that wins out. IT WORKS! Now all the Shaolin monks in USA or Europe (for the most part) realize that, to be taken seriously, leave the suit and the jogging uniform at home. That is just the marketing reality! amitofu |
|
#38
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
He's a disciple. He has every right to wear what he does, and say what he is saying, as far as I know of him. |
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
|
check this out. these sticks are not breaking! he's just caraaazy!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vD75-zRluy0 i like how he says; "strong, boy! come on!" you cant hurt this guy. i think if you have any doubts you can try to tell him yourself! bring sticks, bricks or whatever. |
|
#40
|
||||
|
||||
|
2 things.
1. If you don't break the stick on them, it tends to get them heated lmao. 2. Keep in mind a lot of the preliminary stuff is just to make things look good. You could walk up to him and smash a kick into him or crack a stickball bat on him sameway. It's not like he needs to do all those preliminary chi movements. Okay, three things, is that a turntable set up there in the back....? if so, major PROPS are in order lol. |
|
#41
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() the only thing i dont like about that video is how they almost killed the audience members. what the hell were they thinking? he could have been in some serious trouble for that one. |
|
#42
|
||||
|
||||
|
yeah they got lucky on that one.
I mean, not to get all monty python, but...those stick fragments have some hustle on them, and you know it's all fun and games until someone gets a stick in their eye. We usually have gym mats set up. |
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
|
well still, you usually stand facing the audience so the stick doesnt go flying directly at them.
thats what confused me. wasnt it obvious that if it broke it would fly straight into the crowd? |
|
#44
|
|||
|
|||
|
More on Yanlei
Interesting marketing. Did he really get an endorsement from Oprah and Tiger? That would be awesome.
Quote:
__________________
Gene Ching Associate Publisher Kung Fu Magazine & www.KungFuMagazine.com |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|